The reason is that a bond fund is always investing the interest payments from the bonds it holds as well as reinvesting the proceeds of maturing bonds in new bonds. When interest rates are rising, that money is being invested in bonds with higher yields, which eventually boosts the fund's return. Granted, it can take a while for this process to overcome the hit that bond prices take when rates rise.
But this dynamic pays off if you are investing for the long term , say, for a goal like funding your retirement. Related: Is now the time to invest my retirement savings in stocks? But perhaps the most important reason to continue to hold bonds is that, rising rates or no, bonds still fulfill what for long-term investors is their most important function: They act as a bulwark against the volatility of the stock market. In general, bonds tend to do well when stocks do poorly.
Aggregate Bond Index gained 5. Of course, bonds can also go through periods where they suffer losses. So rather than avoiding bonds altogether, you should instead be thinking about how best to divvy up your portfolio between stocks and bonds. Ideally, you want to own enough stocks to get the superior long-term growth that stocks have historically provided, but at the same time you want to have enough bonds to provide some stability to your portfolio and to mitigate the downsize when stocks go into one of their periodic slumps.
There's no stocks-bonds mix that's ideal for everyone. But you can at least get a sense of what's appropriate for you by going to this risk tolerance-asset allocation tool.
The tool will also show you how your recommended mix, as well as others more conservative and more aggressive, have performed on average in the past and in both good and bad markets. Once you've settled on the percentage of bonds that makes sense, you can then consider measures to protect yourself somewhat from the effects of rising interest rates. The best way to estimate how much of a hit a bond fund may take when rates rise is by looking at the fund's duration, which is a gauge of a bond fund's sensitivity to changes in interest rates.
For example, a total U. When stock markets experience a sharp fall, bonds act as a diversifier and reduce the overall volatility of the portfolio. The relative lack of volatility is the primary reason investors should have fixed income exposure in their portfolios.
Although increasing interest rates result in immediate bond price declines, long-term returns are actually enhanced due to the ability to reinvest at higher rates. Consider the scenario below that depicts the impact of a one percentage point increase in yield on the total return of a bond.
As you can see, the one percentage point increase in interest rates results in a loss for Year 1, but by Year 2 the cumulative return turns positive because interest and principal are being reinvested at higher rates.
Over time, the cumulative return grows even more as the benefit of higher rates compounds. The above example uses the Barlcalys Aggregate Bond Index, which has a yield of 2. For ease of presentation, this analysis assumes a one-time parallel shift in yields and then no further fluctuation in interest rates. In addition, I assume that all income received is reinvested, which is extremely important because reinvesting income at higher rates helps offset the losses in the initial hike year and increases the total return of the bond portfolio over time.
The same holds true for a more dramatic rate hike scenario of three percentage points, although recovering from the initial loss takes a little longer. An interest rate hike of this magnitude has occurred only twice in history and , but serves as sort of a worst-case scenario analysis. As you can see, the Year 1 return is dramatically worse with a larger interest rate increase — in fact, it would be the second worst month return for the U.
Although the initial loss is more dramatic than the initial example above, the result is the same: higher yields benefit investors in the long run by providing higher returns over time. Global bonds are the largest investable asset class, yet the area where most investors are underexposed.
Using global bonds with hedged currency exposure has historically provided a dramatic reduction in volatility, which can be seen in the table below that compares the Barclays U.
Another reason for the reduction in volatility is that global bonds adds to the number of issuers in a portfolio and, thus, diversifies among different credit risks. If too much money is invested in safe, risk-free U. Treasury bonds, that basically insures a very low return on an investment. So, for those who want to grow their capital, stocks are the only game in town.
Stocks are a tool to make money, Cramer said, and bonds are for capital preservation — for protecting money and providing a small, steady return that can offset the impact of inflation. How much of a retirement portfolio should be kept in bonds versus stocks? Cramer broke it down by age:. Unless you are born with a silver spoon in your mouth, accruing wealth does not come easily, which is why Cramer is so passionate about helping investors find a viable financial strategy.
The gains will continue to grow, because each year, money is made from the previous year's profits. With that 10 percent average annual return, an investor can double his money in about seven years, Cramer said. For instance, if a year-old is just entering the workforce, she has more than 40 years before she retires. When it comes to investing, Cramer always says investors must have two discrete places for their cash.
The first is a retirement portfolio, which is more conservative and should be invested through a tax favored vehicle like a k or an Individual Retirement Account. The second is a discretionary or "mad money" portfolio.
0コメント